Planned for publication in 2024 (autumn)
See below for the original Call for Proposals for LDJ8.
Theme: Exploring Grassroots, Innovative, and Creative Approaches to Language Learning Materials Development Through Inclusive Practitioner-Research
CALL FOR EXPLORATORY AND PRACTICE-BASED INQUIRIES AND REVIEWS
Deadline: Sunday 15 January 2023
Editors: Anna Costantino, Assia Slimani-Rolls, and Nour Bouacha
We are three language teachers, practitioner researchers and multidisciplinary academics who share a common interest in the mutual development of learners and teachers and learner-centred language pedagogies enacted through practitioner-research. We are keen to work with other teachers and students, and student-teachers who are eager to explore and discuss the questions and puzzles those learners and teachers bring to learning materials development.
If you are interested in exploring questions like the following, please consider submitting a proposal for LDJ8:
- What puzzles do you and your learners have about developing materials, and how might you explore those puzzles together?
- In what ways is learner-led materials development useful and important for learner development? Why now?
- How could “Quality of Life and Learning” for the learners and for us as teachers be enhanced through co-designing learning materials as investigative tools?
- What models or frameworks can be used for facilitating learners’ involvement inmaterials development?
- How can we embed critical theories (e.g., critical race, gender, and disability theories) in principled materials evaluation and development frameworks, alongside/as opposed to SLA, and put learners’ needs and wants centre-stage?
- How can we embrace translanguaging practices in materials development against nativistic and normative practices and perspectives of learner development?
- How could the learner be a catalyst in challenging top-down, Anglocentric and Western approaches to materials development and implementation, and promote local understandings? And why?
- How can co-learning, co-designing, and co-inquiring in materials development enhance assessment for learning and assessment as learning?
For LDJ8 we envisage grassroots practice-based inquiries aimed at critically situated understandings. We invite contributions from diverse areas of language(s) education from primary through to tertiary, and/or in other relevant contexts, to explore how creative and innovative materials development can be realised through practitioner-driven investigations and learner involvement. Contributions will include practitioners’ and students’ reflections, both individual and collective, generated within communities of practice through different research-driven inquiries.
Possible areas of activity and inquiry
Some specific areas of activity and inquiry that we hope contributors will be interested in exploring include:
- Acknowledging learners’ translanguaging practices (academic, critical, digital, multi modal) in materials design and their impact on literacy development
- Learners’ engagement with critical theories (e.g., critical race, gender, intersectionality, disability theories) in materials development
- Learners’ engagement with art in the co-creation of materials and their impact on learner development
- Learners’ explorations of the linguistic landscapes through their engagement with materials (multimodal, digital, etc).
- Learners’ understanding of sustainable learning practices and environments (social, environmental, and economic sustainability) and quality of life through the designing and development of materials
- Mediating learners’ emerging linguistic and cultural identities through the co-designing of materials including learner beliefs and narratives about living and learning
- Materials and the development of learner-centred curricula, pedagogies, approaches, courses, and classrooms in practices
- Pedagogical innovation through the co-creation of materials by learners and by teachers
- Ideologies of language and learning (including native speakerism) in evaluating and designing materials and their impact on educational discourses and institutions, as well as in learner development
- Discourses of the nation-state (and colonialism) and the monolingual bias in materials designing and their impact on learner development.
If there are other areas of inquiry that appeal to you about engaging with bottom-up, grassroots, innovative, and creative approaches to learning materials development, then please feel free to consult with us by email ahead of sending in your proposal. Thanks.
Developing a community of practices together
Our aim is to make the collaborative process of LDJ8 supportive and inclusive by creating a stimulating and enjoyable community of practices of research and writing.
We warmly encourage co-constructed inquiries, co-authorship, and joint participation of students/learners in inquiries and writing.
As a contributor to LDJ8 you will be expected to collaborate with other contributors at different points in the development of your research and writing, for example engaging in discussions of your practices and inquiries, sharing writing, responding to each other’s drafts, and taking part in face-to-face and/or online conversations.
Exploratory writing with a personalised reflective quality
LDJ8 will feature two main types of exploratory writing: exploratory inquiries and practice-related reviews.
As LDJ8 will feature exploratory writing into grassroots, innovative, and creative materials development, we encourage contributors to use narrative, dialogue, interview, and other interactive elements (for example, visual, video, web, multimodal, digital, multimedia) that can enhance the personalised and reflective quality of their inquiries and reviews.
With exploratory inquiries at 5,000-7,000 words, we are looking for around 6-10 contributions, each with a strong personalised reflective quality. We invite contributors to LDJ8 to:
- ground their writing in concerns and questions that they have about engaging with learner-led materials development
- write their inquiries in personalised reflective ways
- include different voices
- relate their inquiry to arguments and debates in the field where appropriate, and
- write questioningly to construct critical understanding and reflection on practices, issues, discourses, and theorisations on learning materials development and evaluation.
We also encourage contributors to adopt an exploratory stance in their writing and to experiment. See, for example, the following pieces and enquiries into Exploratory Practice by Zhang, R. (2004), Chen, Y. S. (2016), Alison Stewart, Robert Croker, Judith Hanks (2015), Leena Karlsson and Fergal Bradley (2018), Michelle Rawson and Maria Esther Lecumberri (2019), and Yoshitaka Kato and Judith Hanks (2021).
For practice-related reviews, we would like to include reflective commentaries at around 2,000 – 3,000 words that explore print, digital, web, multimedia materials development in grassroots, innovative, and creative ways. Sources for such reviews could include presentations, workshops, blogs, book chapters, papers, (online) course modules, software apps, video-talks, books, and so on. As a reviewer, you would need to relate your review to exploring your own local learner development practices and concerns rather than trying to provide objective, ‘clinical’ summaries of particular sources. Please consider also reviewing one of these published books (for the inaccessible copies, we hope to get an inspection copy to share with you):
Bao, D. (Ed.). (2018). Creativity and innovations in ELT materials development: Looking beyond the current design. Multilingual Matters.
Bori, P. (2018). Language textbooks in the era of neoliberalism. Routledge.
Exploratory Practice Group (2021). Why Seek to Understand Life in the Classroom. Experiences of the Exploratory Practice Group. British Council.
Maley, A., & Peachey, N. (Eds.). (2015). Creativity in the English language classroom. British Council.
Risager, K. (2018). Representations of the world in language textbooks. Multilingual Matters.
Smith, R., & Rebolledo, P. (2018). A Handbook for Exploratory Action Research. British Council.
Slimani-Rolls, A., & Kiely, R. (2019). Exploratory Practice for continuing professional development. Palgrave Macmillan.
Tin, T. B. (2022). Unpacking creativity for language teaching. Routledge.
If there are other books or sources about engaging with materials development from the perspective of learner development that you find inspiring, or especially thought-provoking, and that you would like to review, please contact us to share your ideas. Thanks.
Staged development of research and writing
Rather than working exclusively towards a full draft from the outset, we feel it is more productive and enriching to build on, re-work, and extend your research and writing in stages through sharing incomplete drafts, discussing them, and getting peer responses from other contributors, as well as later receiving feedback from LDJ Review Network members, and the LDJ8 editors.
The draft schedule planned for the staged development of research and writing is as follows (we may adjust some details later after further discussion with contributors):
|15th January 2023||Proposal deadline|
|End of February 2023||Notifications of acceptance|
|March & April 2023||Discussion of inquiries and plans|
|30th April 2023||First piece of writing: exploratory inquiries: 1,200-1,500 words; practice-related reviews: 600-1,000 words; peer responses|
|31st August 2023||Second piece of writing (building on, re-working, and extending the first piece): exploratory inquiries: |
|September & October 2023||Feedback from LDJ Review Network members|
|15th December 2023 – 31st January 2023||Third piece of writing (building on, re-working, and extending the second piece): full draft (exploratory inquiries: 5,000 to 7,000 words; practice-related reviews: 2,000-3,000 words)|
|February & March 2024||Feedback from peers, editors, and LDJ Steering Group|
|April & May 2024||Finalised drafts|
|June, July, August 2024||Finalisation of all texts, including abstracts and keywords (English and Japanese, plus another language) and author bios (English and Japanese, plus another language)|
|September 2024||Proofreading and final checks|
Initial inquiries and prop0osals (Deadline Sunday 15 January 2023)
1. If you wish to check anything with us ahead of sending in your proposal, please email us at: JALT LDJ8 email@example.com, and we will get back to you as soon as we can.
2. The deadline for all proposals is Sunday 15 January 2023.
3. For your proposal, please include the following information in a Word document.
Member of JALT Learner Development SIG? Yes/No
Proposal guideline: Start with a brief story about yourself and your working (or studying) context(s), and your interest in exploring grassroots, innovative, and creative approaches to language learning materials development through inclusive practitioner research. Indicate which type of writing you plan to do.
For an exploratory inquiry, write around 500 to 600 words to introduce your proposed inquiry. Include also your ideas and/or concerns about writing in a personalised reflective way.
For a practice-related review, write about 250 to 300 words, identifying the book or source(s) you are interested in reviewing and why, and focusing on practices and/or questions that you plan to relate your review to.
4. Send your completed proposal to us (Anna Costantino, Nour Bouacha, and Assia Rolls) at: JALT LDJ8 firstname.lastname@example.org
We are looking forward to hearing from you—and if you have any questions or concerns along the way, please feel free to email us at <email@example.com> and we will get back to you as soon as we can.
Anna Costantino (University of Greenwich/Regent’s University London), Assia Slimani-Rolls (Regent’s University London), and Nour Bouacha (Bachir Ibrahimi University, BBA)